seaart in 2026, when the platform is no longer at the level of providing AI image generation services.
It seems to me that the government is trying to divide the exposure of sexual and violent expression by region (and country), but as far as personal image generation is concerned, we should respect freedom of expression and maintain an environment in which people can create freely. Otherwise, while AI may learn, its actual use will be restricted, which goes against the original purpose of AI use. I think there is a way, such as separating +18 and the rest, although it is becoming more severe worldwide with regard to submissions. seaart's attempt to partially correct the problem has resulted in a lack of consistency among the nodes it writes, which is the reason for the lack of correction and individualized response at any time this time. I think you should review the platform program again, fundamentally. If you are going to charge anyway, there are other platforms without censorship.
I'm sure there are other platforms out there without censorship.
,.
Log in to comment and vote
Comments1
meimei
Jan 4
ご指摘いただいた審査システムの一貫性については、以前から私もチームに改善提案をフィードバックしています。しかし、このようなシステムの最適化や改善は一朝一夕でできるものではなく、長期間にわたりノウハウを蓄積しながら絶えず改善していく必要があります。
どうかご理解とご辛抱をお願いいたします。私たちも審査の統一性と正確性の向上に引き続き努めてまいります。貴重なご意見とご支援、誠にありがとうございます。