Skip to main content

NSFW Content Restrictions

If a site originally allowed NSFW content, it should not change that policy. Users subscribed for a year precisely because NSFW content was permitted; suddenly altering the terms constitutes misleading advertising and violates the Act Against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations (Article 5, Item 1).

Children should not be viewing content in areas where NSFW material exists in the first place. Instead of regulating content, the platform should separate NSFW content into designated areas.

The service was already failing when NSFW content slipped through and appeared. They should have provided a dedicated space and required posting there.

The inability to generate content is also problematic. Even if posting isn't possible yet, the ability to generate content should be restored first.

Additionally, they should restore the text removed due to restrictions from saved content.

If they won't restore it, they should issue refunds.

Status: Completed8 comments

Log in to comment and vote

Comments8

  • JJJJulio

    Team•

    Feb 4

    ご意見ありがとうございます。現在、私たちは審査モデルの最適化を継続しています。以前に審査された一部のコンテンツについても再審査を行い、質の高いコンテンツを再度皆様にご利用いただけるようにします。ご不便をおかけして申し訳ありませんが、今後の最新情報にご注目ください。

    • Noper Nopes

      •

      Feb 6

      You are a lying, thieving waste of humanity. I hope dogs urinate on you for the rest of your life

  • 周鈺翔(qwe59740)

    •

    Feb 2

    So I don't use Seaart anymore, anyway, its poor moderation has blocked many images, and I switched to other sites that allow NFSW, and as you said, it is divided into two modes to allow people to choose the service.
  • Константин Юдин

    •

    Feb 2

    Unfortunately, they don't care. The Chinese government is unfair.