Comprehensive Feedback: Review Transparency and Platform Experience Improvements
Dear SeaArt Team,
Thank you for your continued responses. (Around 5 days ago, so after 7 days after I submit first message inquiry for issue I've experienced.)
I would like to formally escalate this matter, as the issues experienced are no longer isolated, but indicate broader concerns across review transparency, feature reliability, and overall creator experience on the platform.
A. Review System Transparency & Communication Gaps
1. Unresolved Status — Yvette Luminara
My AI character, Yvette Luminara, remains in “under review” status without any update, feedback, or resolution.
This creates a complete lack of visibility and prevents further iteration or compliance.
2. Silent Status Change — Seraphina Nightvale
For Seraphina Nightvale, the review status was eventually lifted. However, this occurred without any notification.
The only way this was discovered was through repeated manual checking.
This indicates a core issue:
No notification system for status changes
No communication loop to inform creators of outcomes
Increased uncertainty in time-sensitive workflows
B. Support Accessibility & Inclusivity
The current redirection toward Discord as a primary support channel presents an accessibility issue:
Not all users utilize or have access to Discord
This approach is not inclusive and cannot be considered a universal support solution
There is no clearly defined direct, accountable support channel within the platform itself
This creates fragmentation and reduces the effectiveness of issue resolution.
C. Feature Reliability Issues
Several core features are currently not functioning reliably:
Reverse Prompt from Image
Stamina is consumed, but the output field remains blank, resulting in resource loss without resultVideo Generation from Image
Frequently does not follow prompt instructions, despite higher stamina cost compared to image generation
D. Content Management Limitations
There are significant limitations in managing creative assets:
In My Profile → Favorites, only recently favorited images are accessible
Older favorited works are not retrievable, limiting usability as a reference library
No option to bulk organize or transfer favorited images into custom collections or folders
This restricts workflow efficiency for creators who rely on structured visual libraries.
E. Moderation & Creative Constraint Concerns
The current moderation and censorship approach can feel overly restrictive in the context of artistic creation:
Limits aesthetic and stylistic exploration
Reduces flexibility in producing expressive, high-quality visual work
Lacks clear boundaries or guidelines that creators can reliably follow
F. Lack of Technical Guidance for Core Parameters
There is insufficient in-platform explanation for critical image generation parameters, such as:
VAE selection
CFG scale differences
Sampling methods
Steps
Img2Img strength
LoRA value impact
While beginner guides exist, they are:
Not integrated contextually within the workflow
Not sufficiently detailed or standardized
Less accessible to new or intermediate users who need clear, actionable understanding
Additionally, explanations regarding model engines and LoRA usage lack consistency and technical clarity.
Request for Consideration & Action
To improve both creator experience and platform reliability, I would strongly recommend:
Resolution and status clarity for Yvette Luminara
Implementation of basic notification systems for review updates
Establishment of a direct, platform-based support channel with clear ownership
Improvements in feature reliability, especially for stamina-consuming functions
Enhanced content management tools (full access, sorting, bulk organization)
Clearer, more structured moderation guidelines
Integrated, detailed technical documentation for all major parameters and tools
SeaArt has strong potential as a platform for high-quality creative work. However, consistency, transparency, and usability across these core areas are essential to support serious creators and sustain long-term engagement.
I hope this escalation will be reviewed with the appropriate level of attention and translated into meaningful improvements.
Sincerely,
CM
Log in to comment and vote
Comments1
JJJJulio
Apr 1
Thank you for your feedback. Regarding the issues you raised:
Currently, we conduct manual reviews for works that have been appealed multiple times. Due to the high volume of submissions, the review process may take some time. Therefore, I suggest you reach out to customer service for expedited review. Additionally, once the review is complete, you will be notified of the results through the system. You can check the message center for updates.
Our channels for addressing bug issues include Discord, the customer service email (customer@seaart.ai), and the customer help entry at the bottom right corner of our website. You can expect a response from customer service within 24 hours through these channels. This space is only for collecting suggestions, and I check and respond here approximately once a week, so bug issues cannot be resolved through this channel.
I am unable to provide answers regarding functional bugs and tutorial issues; please seek assistance from customer service for more professional help.
I will pass on your suggestions for optimizing the favorites interface in the personal center to the technical team for evaluation.
Due to regional policies and increasingly strict external regulations, we have to strengthen content review to ensure more sustainable development.
Thank you again for your feedback. I will address your requests and suggestions promptly.