Systemic Breach of User Trust and Platform Integrity

SeaArt is actively undermining user trust through a series of systemic decisions and practices that demonstrate disregard for both its community and basic principles of transparency.

1. Unauthorized Deletion of User Data
   You removed the entire contents of my “Favorites” without any prior notice or warning. This included a year’s worth of accumulated material: reference images, technical benchmarks for AI generation, useful applications, checkpoints, LoRAs, and AI characters. This collection functioned as a personal working library. Its complete and irreversible deletion is unacceptable.

2. Destructive Alteration of User Prompts
   Your system retroactively censors “prohibited” words in previously created prompts without any regard for context. As a result, prompts that were once functional are now broken and unusable without manual reconstruction. This directly disrupts users’ workflows and devalues their prior work.

3. Tolerance and Promotion of Fraudulent Activity
   You take no meaningful action against users who artificially inflate their popularity through bots and other dishonest methods. On the contrary, such accounts are often promoted to top positions in rankings. This sends a clear message: traffic metrics matter more to you than your own rules or fairness.

4. Exploitative Subscription Practices
   Your payment system allows charges to be executed without clear, active user confirmation. This has resulted in numerous cases of unauthorized or unexpected billing, particularly after trial periods. Such practices resemble exploitation rather than transparent service provision.

5. Excessive and Unjustified Content Restrictions
   You have effectively removed the ability for adult users to create and view mature content by implementing multi-layered censorship, including at the model level. This goes beyond restricting explicit material and interferes with legitimate creative expression. In jurisdictions where such content is legal—especially in private use—this constitutes an unreasonable limitation of user rights.

6. Failure of Creative Initiatives
   Your initiatives aimed at encouraging creativity and promoting original content are fundamentally flawed. Biased moderation and opaque rules render these programs ineffective and discourage genuine creators from participating.

7. Post-Factum Manipulation of Engagement Metrics
   Likes on posts are being reduced or removed over time without explanation. For example, works submitted to challenges receive a certain number of likes, only for that number to decrease or disappear later. This kind of systemic interference erodes confidence in the platform and demotivates content creators.

SeaArt, in its current state, demonstrates a pattern of behavior that prioritizes short-term metrics over user trust, transparency, and fairness. Unless these issues are addressed, the platform risks losing credibility among serious creators.