Isn't that a bit much?
Tutorial Lab: Creative Deconstruction Challenge
A creative contest called "Creative Deconstruction Challenge" is currently underway.
Based on what I can confirm right now, there are four accounts with three-digit like counts.
I won’t name them to avoid causing any trouble, but I encourage anyone reading this to check them out for themselves.
True to the "tutorial" theme, the engagement rates for these four accounts—the percentage of people who not only "like" the post but also click through to view the content—exceed 80%, give or take a margin of error.
It’s clear from their activity that they took their time accumulating likes throughout the contest period.
I believe this is how it should be.
Why did I exclude one account?
I won’t name names. My goal isn’t to shame anyone .
I was able to confirm three posts, all of which were posted within 3 to 1 days, and all of which had over 150 likes. However, given that this was a contest centered on tutorials, the content view rate was less than 33%, which is extremely low compared to others.
Changing the subject, when using a bot to inflate likes, the following characteristics can be observed.
Since users are only clicking “Like,” the like count goes up, but it’s not hard to imagine that the view rate drops because opening and viewing the work requires a more complex program. Let’s get back to the topic.
In other contests or daily challenges, there are likely many people who just look at the thumbnail and hit "Like."
There’s nothing surprising about the view rate dropping in that case. After all, you can judge the quality of a work just by looking at the thumbnail.
But in the case of contests like tutorial contests—which involve step-by-step guides or “secret manuals”—I don’t think there are that many people who would “like” a post based solely on the thumbnail without checking the actual content, rather than just the quality of the artwork.
Of course, there are probably some followers who visit the person’s page and hit “Like” out of courtesy, but even so… don’t you think that’s a bit much? In fact, the view rates for the other four accounts are probably over 60% at the very least.
How does the administration view this?
The value of the likes accumulated by the four accounts with over 100 followers—where more than 80% of people took the time to check the content during the contest period—versus the value of the over 150 likes gathered in less than 24 hours by that one account with a view rate of less than a third.
Log in to comment and vote
Comments5
JJJJulio
May 15
ご意見をお寄せいただきありがとうございます。
今回ご指摘いただいた件について、運営としても内容を確認しております。 チュートリアル系の投稿であっても、現状の表示上は一部のユーザーに通常の作品投稿と同じように受け取られ、詳細を開かずに「いいね」を付けているケースもある可能性があると考えております。
なお、報酬や評価については「いいね」の数のみに基づいて決定しているものではなく、投稿内容の質やテーマとの適合性などを含めて総合的に判断しております。 今後は、作品系の投稿とチュートリアル系の投稿の違いがより分かりやすく伝わるよう、表示面の改善を検討してまいります。
あわせて、コンテストや各種イベントについても、より公平にご参加いただけるよう、引き続き監視と管理体制の強化に努めてまいります。
貴重なご意見をありがとうございました。
初快ラク(ハツケラク)
May 15
ステータスがCompletedになっているけど、「監視と管理体制の強化」で解決するようには思えないのだけど・・・
No Noagain
May 11
Those of us that frequently visit the site know EXACTLY which 4 accounts you're talking about. And we've noticed it as well - they automate multiple accounts, as well as automating those accounts to “like" every new post that comes in (regardless of quality) and they farm reciprocal likes (liking something back as a courtesy, like you mentioned).
SeaArt has no interest in stopping this behaviour. It benefits SeaArt.