Doubts Regarding the Selection Criteria for Regulated Works

Attached

The attached image is my entry for today's (2/19 (Thu)) daily challenge theme 'Ready Player One'. However, SeaArt judged this work to be suggestive of sexual expression.

Strangely enough, among the submitted works, some contained blatantly explicit sexual content, yet they were viewed as if there were no issues whatsoever and even received ratings from other users.

I cannot help but feel outraged by SeaArt's extremely ambiguous 'criteria for determining what is subject to regulation'. They completely ignore any suggestions made, and their actions seem designed to sweep even their own judgment errors under the rug. If this isn't systematic fraud, what else could it possibly be called?!

Did SeaArt's management, which caused the major issue last year where all users couldn't view their own works, learn nothing? Will they continue this negligent and arrogant operation without any sign of improvement?!

All users, consider this: Mr. Mari Ipo's work※① is not subject to 'Ready Player One' restrictions, yet my work, Agito's※②, is. Can this truly be called fair and impartial regulation※③ to protect order?!

※① Fellatio depiction in the image above

※② Middle image: depiction of a cyber-chic girl

※③ Bottom image: Result of the appeal